CLICK
THE "HOME" TAB ON ANY PAGE IN THIS SITE
TO RETURN TO THE MAIN NAVIGATIONAL PAGE
OR CHOOSE FROM THE LEFT NAV MENU
[TVOTW
Insert - If the destination page or web site for the link below does
not function - it has either been removed or closed down on
the orders or instructions of persons or entities unknown to TVOTW
for reasons that can only be speculated upon - having
regard to the content or revelations contained herein.]
TVOTW
- PAGE INDEX
FROM:
http://www.metro.co.uk/metro/home/live/index.html?
in_page_id=10
FOETUS
IS DENIED THE RIGHT TO LIFE
By
David Harding
A gynaecologist
escaped a manslaughter charge yesterday because judges were unable
to rule whether a foetus has the right to life.
Frances
Golfier had to abort the six month old foetus of mother Thi-Nho Vo,
37, after he accidentally pierced her amniotic sac during an examination
at a hospital in Lyons.
But
French courts ruled he could not be prosecuted for manslaughter as
the foetus was not a human and thus not protected by criminal law.
Yesterday,
the European Court of Human Rights backed that decision as there was
no agreement among European countries over whether a child in the
womb was a human being. ..."
FROM:
http://www.metro.co.uk/metro/home/live/index.html?
in_page_id=10
[TVOTW
Insert - TVOTW considers it to be unforgiveable
and unconscionable that these fundamental principles are still in
doubt in the year 2004 in the legal system of the largest group of
democracies in the world. As a result - the matter needs to be addressed
without delay and in no uncertain terms.
People
in the United States in particular are not backward or in any way
reticent in expressing their views as to the fundamental so-called
"inalienable" rights of the individual.
Recently
- TVOTW asked an everyday person in the street the following question.
"In the case of abortion - how many rights does the unborn child
have?" The man paused to think for some few moments and then
answered - "Well - None!!"
If
that is so - is this consistent with the principle enshrined in law
that all of humankind are equal before the law thereby providing a
balance of rights between the parties? The answer to the question
is a plain commonsense. "No!!"
To
some - the inescapable arrival of an unborn child can be regarded
as nothing more than an inconvenience and this fact should not and
must not - ever be interpreted as a right to kill contrary to the
6th commandment as delivered to Moses - "Thou shalt not commit
murder".]
--------------------------------------------------
LEGAL
PRINCIPLES
IN RELATION TO THE ABORTION OF A HUMAN FOETUS
There
is a natural right to life, prior to all positive law, including the
Constitution of any political state. A human embryo is a living organism
which when permitted to remain in its mother's
womb ("the natural
incubator") will reach
a certain stage in it's development when the organism can sustain life
without the support of the said natural incubator at which time the
natural incubator ejects the organism (the "birthing process")
and at all times thereafter the organism remains a self sustaining and
self responsible member of the human race entitled to the protection
and support of as well as acknowledging the rights, obligations, duties
and responsibilities of all human beings according to and under the
rule of law.
As
a consequence of the above - at all times prior to it's removal from
the natural incubator
during the said birthing process after
approximately 38 (thirty eight) weeks from conception - the organism
is recognised classified and acknowledged under the law as "a baby
human being" and as such any wilful or premature act of removal
from the natural incubator by any other human being whosoever that person
may be resulting in the loss of life to that baby human being shall
be classified as an act of unlawful killing under the law.
Only
in the most exceptionable of cases - where the presence of the baby
human being in the natural incubator prior to the birthing process can
be shown beyond
reasonable doubt to be harmful
or fatal or otherwise threaten the health and well being of the mother
can the baby human being be removed from
the natural incubator prematurely
or prior
to the birthing process without fear of prosecution under the criminal
law.
Take
Me To A Related Article
